The good news here is that the e609, SM57, and e906 all have no excessive low-frequency build-up. SoundMaximum is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon LLC owned websites. I use the SM57 to record almost anything, and it really is a very versatile microphone since it can be used on vocals, with a good pop filter in front of it otherwise the plosives will be too much, on electric guitar cabinets, to record drums, and it’s designed to be used both in the studio and on stage. Also, you don’t need to worry about phantom power, since the SM57, e609, and e906 all do not need any extra driving power. In addition, Sennheiser e906 is coming with three-position switchable sound character: bright, moderate, and dark. I've worked in a music studio a couple of years back and now I mostly record at home and try to learn as much as I can about producing music and about the gear that is required to do so. Note: You might be interested in learning more about other dynamic microphones, so here are a couple posts I wrote that should help you out: The Sennheiser e906 looks to be the upgraded version of the e609, which is another instrument-specific microphone I reviewed some time ago. For years now I've been interested in music production. While this may be good for some uses, when you use it to mic a guitar cabinet, you don’t feel the warmth in the sound so much. I have seen people practically try to induce distortion by cranking up sound sources volumes, but without any success. I love recording my electric guitar with it since the sound is clear, warm and also has a nice low-end, and when recording clean tones, I don’t hear any particular frequencies being too prominent. This is quite uncommon, especially for dynamic mics, but this design has its benefits. So, feel free to use them for a mic cabinet even during a heavy metal performance. Both microphones are absolutely fantastic, plus they are quite affordable when compared to other similar-sounding ones. The reason the SM57 is used for recording instruments is because of the grille: The SM57 has a built-in grille that’s actually part of the cartridge, which means that the diaphragm of the microphone can be placed a bit closer to the sound source, whereas on other dynamic microphones that have a ball grille that also works as a regular pop filter, you can’t get it as close. This pattern makes a lot of sense for the kind of use that the SM57 is often subjected to. You can choose between a flat response, a presence boost and a presence cut. However, when we look at the Sennheiser e906, we see that it has the most unique characteristics, especially in features and sound quality. I have and use both the SM57 and e609, and I honestly cannot tell the difference between them sonically. A lot. It’s possible that the reason is that e906 has 3000Hz more room in its high frequencies than both the SM57 and e609. Now, more often than not, I like engaging the presence boost since it helps my guitar to better sit in the mix, but this might depend on your preferences. When I compared the Shure SM57 to the Sennheiser e609, I ended up preferring the e609 for recording guitar cabinets because the sound was a bit clearer, but both microphone cost roughly the same. Today I will outline the e609 and then compare/contrast it with the SM57 towards the end. Shure Beta 58A vs Sennheiser E935: Is There Any Difference? Listening to it, we can’t really say there’s anything to it, just reproduces what it gats at these frequencies. More hands-on control with the presence boost/cut switch. So this is more SM57 vs e906 comparison, so I don't think that helps you too much. This unique feature is very handy as you handle different instruments with altering properties.


Digitech Drop Alternative, Pokémon Mystery Dungeon: Rescue Team Dx, Mini Cooper S R53, Tc Electronic M350 Used, Pakistan Bagpipes Review, Grow Light Kits,